Tiger safaris and birding with the Nikon 200-500 F5.6


I have been using the Nikon 200-500 F5.6 E since its launch in India a few years back. The fact that I use it along with my other telephoto primes like the 600 F4.0 and the 400 F2.8 speaks a lot about how this lens can keep up with some of the greatest and best lenses out there.

On Indian Tiger safaris, I usually use my 400 F2.8 with my 70-200 f4.0 as this is the one of the best combos to use for large mammals. The sharpness and subject isolation one can get with 400 F2.8 makes this a perfect lens for most situations, as long as you can frame the subject with it.

The 600 F4.0 is used on birding trips where I have to walk short distances with a tripod + Gimbal head + camera or have a safari vehicle to use. This is a specialized birding lens that takes TCs very well and is my preferred shore, desert and plains bird lens.

The 200-500 F5.6 is my trekking, forest and bush birding lens. It also does very well on Indian Tiger safaris when I do not want to pack my heavy lenses and use it as a single, light, small lens, when there are many people to share a single safari vehicle and bigger lenses are tough to use.

Usage as a trekking lens:

I use this lens exclusively as a trekking lens on my D7200, that is a brilliant crop camera for all kind of animals and birds. This combination worked beautifully on long and tiring Himalayan treks/long walks of Chopta ,dry  sandy regions of Taal Chhapar and even wet ocean beds of Narara. The lens is usually slung across my shoulder with my tried and tested F1 sling strap which makes it possible to carry this combo for long periods at a time without much of a problem.

The biggest plus of this lens again is the amazing VR. With good technique and decent light, it is very difficult to spoil images due to camera shake. In early morning winter light and heavy, dark canopies, getting a good shutter speed at low ISOs is big challenge for a F5.6 lens at 500mm. But so good is the VR on this lens that I set my auto ISO to 400, 1/100 as minimum shutter speed and shoot at 500mm without any problems. 95% of the shots are sharp with no camera shake.


Many including me have spoken about the slow focusing of this lens. But in all these days of shooting with this lens, I have never lost a single shot due to slow target acquisition. As mentioned before, the AF is slow, but is sure and once locked stays locked. Shooting all these small, flitting Himalayan birds, who hardly ever stop on a branch for long enough time to really compose and shoot at leisure, was never a problem for my 200-500 F5.6 E.


In the marine wildlife sanctuary of Narara, Jamnagar, walking in ankle deep water  with a heavy prime lens plus a camera on a tripod is just not fun enough. The beautiful corals, sponges and the other lovely aquatic life like octopuses, sea cucumbers, puffer fishes, crabs and birds like crab plovers, waders need a lot of attention to enjoy and a heavy camera rig is the last thing on my mind here. I walked here for aroun 4-5 hours and had some of the best wild life shooting of my life just walking around with my D7200 + 200-500 F5.6 E combo.



Even Taal Chappar was a great revelation walking around with a light rig while my heavy prime + tripod companions were nowhere nearly as mobile as me thus enabling me to get a lot more keepers than them.


Usage as a safari lens:

Till about a few years back the Canon 100-400L was the most seen and used lens on Indian Tiger safaris. But since the launch of the 200-500 f5.6 E, this is easily one of the most popular lenses seen on a safari. Yes, it does not have the razor sharpness or the subject isolation of expensive, faster primes lenses but being a zoom its hugely practical, versatile and very usable on the field.


The small size allows me to quickly point and shoot in any direction that I want and reaction times are way superior to a camera with a prime lens which allows me to capture that particular moment that very often gets lost in setting up your big prime.

In a crowded vehicle this is particularly of great importance as one can shoot from any tiny bit of space that is available.


The Negatives:

No lens is perfect and the 200-500 f5.6 E is no exception. It suffers from the biggest bug bear of most Nikon telephoto zooms and primes of not being adequately sharp at a distance. But its way better than the 80-400 F4.0-5.6 G and the 200-400 F4.0, who are its nearest competitors.  The lack of nano coating does seem to affect its ability to produce a good contrast for subjects shots against the light. But thanks to the excellent DR of my D800E, I was able to extract a decent image out of  a completely washed out image as shown below.


This lens has replaced my 300 F4.0 D lens and I don’t really miss it at all except for its ability to focus close. This is my biggest complaint of the 200-500 F5.6 which makes it a tough lens to use for butterflies. I really wish Nikon made it focus closer than it currently does.

Not particularly a negative, but there is no doubt that IQ is much better on a FX camera than a DX and this is something that is easily visible if you shoot on both bodies.

Final word:

The Nikon 200-500 F5.6E is my most used lens and is easily one of my best lenses whose positives easily outweigh its negatives. Other lenses may change around it but this is one lens that always gets a place in my bag.



5 thoughts on “Tiger safaris and birding with the Nikon 200-500 F5.6

  1. Super images as usual Mayur. I need to decide between this lens and the Sigma Sports 150-600 and am considering the Sigma for its 600 reach. Have a D7200 and a 300/4 AF-S but badly need VR especially with the 1.4 and 1.7 TCs. Am loath to let go of the 300, a stellar lens but for lack of VR.


    1. I agree the 300 4.0 D is a super lens but the lack of VR makes it a tough lens to use especially to sustain shutter speeds over 1/300 without cranking up the ISO. I understand that the lure of the 600mm reach, especially if birds is your primary target, is very much real. But weight and a less sophisticated VR/OS drives me towards the Nikon 200-500 5.6E.


      1. Yes, I heard about the awesome VR and that’s one of the pros for the Nikon compared to the Sigma Sport. That and lighter weight means that I can think about leaving the monopod home.


  2. I should qualify that I prefer to shoot more fast action. For these situations, the 200-500 doesn’t cut it for birds. Hence my preference for my 300 2.8 + TC14 does. Larger birds & mammals, and in good light, 200-500 cant be beat.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s